The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts) Defendant did not commit an indecent act against the victim as stated in the facts charged of this case.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which convicted the Defendant of the facts charged of this case is erroneous and adversely affected by the judgment.

2. Summary of the facts charged and the judgment of the court below

A. The summary of the facts charged is the relationship between the Defendant and the victim C (at 25 years of age) and the high school located in the United States and drinking alcohol in the vicinity of the E Station located in the Gu during the Ansan-si of August 25, 2015 with the victim on August 25, 2015.

The defendant is not suitable for the victim under the influence of alcohol.

On August 26, 2015, 202:45, the defective victim called “Is If Is If Is If Is If Is If Is If Is Is you in the nearby telecom, I would like to enter a room in which Is if Is if Is you would find Is if Is if Is you would like to find Is if Is if Is if Is you would like to find Is if Is if Is if Is you would like to know.

On August 26, 2015, from around 05:00 to around 05:20, the Defendant used the instant guest room to search a bus with a cell phone as expected by the victim, followed by the victim, and met the victim, etc., while the victim was boomed by the Defendant’s hand, and even when the victim frighted the Defendant’s hand, the Defendant breaddddddddd the victim, even though the victim avoidedd the Defendant. As above, the Defendant breadddd the victim, even though the victim avoidedd

Accordingly, the Defendant committed an indecent act on the part of the victim.

B. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that there was no fact that the defendant committed an indecent act against the victim.

However, the victim, from the investigative agency to this court, consistently and specifically stated about the acts of the defendant, details of damage, the fear and response of the victim, the situation before and after the crime, and the relation between the defendant and the U.S. high school in the U.S., was relatively friendly with the relation of the leakage and the birth. The victim, who had been aware of for a long time, thereby damaging the defendant even when taking charge of the punishment for perjury.