1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

A. Of the 12 floors of the building indicated in the attached Form 12, the indication of the attached Form Ga, B, C, D.

1. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. Fact 1) The conclusion of the instant lease agreement and the Plaintiff’s business report filed by the Defendant on May 27, 2014, indicated on the 12th floor of the building indicated on the attached Form No. 2, B, C, D, E, F, and A, the part inside the ship connecting each point of the attached Form No. 165.5 square meters (hereinafter “instant store”).

(3) A lease agreement stipulating that a lease deposit shall be leased with the term from June 1, 2014 to July 31, 2017 (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”) (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”).

(2) Upon entering into a contract, the Plaintiff agreed on the grounds for termination of the contract as follows. Article 29 (Termination upon Violation of the contract) (1) In the event that any of the following causes occurs, the Plaintiff may terminate the contract with a reasonable period fixed and notified the Defendant to perform the contract, and if the Plaintiff fails to perform the contract within the said period, the contract may be terminated. 7. In the event that the business is suspended or discontinued without the Plaintiff’s prior approval, without any prior approval, or the cause falling under any of the following subparagraphs occurs, the Plaintiff may terminate the contract without delay without the notice of performance. 2.

(2) Around August 20, 2015, the Seoul Central District Court (Seoul Central District Court) held that the Plaintiff’s claim against the Plaintiff is seized and assignment order that the Plaintiff’s claim against the Plaintiff is seized, while the Defendant notified the termination of the instant lease agreement at the instant store.