beta
Text
The defendant shall be innocent.
Reasons
1. The summary of the facts charged was recruited by the Defendant to steal the arms and diskettes necessary to enter D’s performance halls, along with his name and unsatisfies.
On December 17, 2015, the defendant distributed admission tickets to the holders of admission tickets in the front of the Busan metropolitan EM building, Busan, Busan, on December 17, 2015, the defendant distributed the right to walk the horses to the victims of the victim F, G, and Ethet who distributed the admission tickets, and then, the victims of the name unsatisfy have 3 malket(140,000 won per head) equivalent to the total market price of the 420,000 won, which the victims kept on the sales stand.
In this regard, the defendant stolen property in an amount equivalent to 4.20,000 won of the market price managed by the victims in collaboration with the victims.
2. Determination
A. First, there is no direct evidence as to the Defendant’s distribution of attention by walking the horses to the victims and part-time students.
At the time of this court, the victims only make a statement that they are ‘any matter' by investigative agencies and persons who distributed their attention, and do not specify them as defendants.
In addition, although the security guard stated that an employee, who is a thief, designated the Defendant as a thief and stated that he was able to take the Defendant as a thief, considering that the Defendant did not clearly indicate who was an employee who was identified as a thief and that the victims at the scene of the crime did not clearly identify the thief as such, the above statement by H cannot be trusted.
B. Furthermore, there is no direct evidence that the Defendant conspired with the larceny.
However, the witness F testified to the effect that the defendant's direct theft act was divided into talks with the defendant's behavior before committing the crime, but it seems that there were many visitors at the time, the witness F did not look closely at the face of the suspect, including the defendant, and the witness F is different.