1. The Plaintiff:

A. As to Defendant A and B, each of whom was KRW 56,069,980, and its amount, from November 21, 2013 to Defendant A.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is an industrial accident insurer at C cafeteria, which is a corporation that carries out industrial accident compensation insurance business entrusted by the Minister of Employment and Labor under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act (hereinafter “Industrial Accident Insurance Act”), and Defendant B is the owner of the D wing Vehicle (hereinafter “instant vehicle”); Defendant Bar Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Company”) is the insurer who has entered into the said automobile comprehensive insurance; and Defendant A (E) is the driver of the said vehicle.

B. At around 14:00 on March 15, 2012, Defendant A driven the instant vehicle and driven the two-lane road in front of the G cafeteria located in Busan Northern-gu, into two-lanes in the direction of the ambroke distance from the ambroke distance, and changed the vehicle to one-lane, Defendant A, even with the vehicle, was shocked of HOba (hereinafter “the instant Obaba”).

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.

Accordingly, the employee I belonging to the C cafeteria who operated the above Oba, suffered from the injury of the c cafeteria, such as the c lebnosis. D.

The Plaintiff recognized the instant accident as an occupational accident, and paid 69,526,420 won in total, including 24,139,280 won for medical care benefits, 15,764,320 won for temporary disability compensation, and 29,62,820 won for lump-sum disability compensation.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entries in Gap evidence 1 through 4 (including those with a shot number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the claim against Defendant A and B

(a) Indication of claims: To be as shown in the reasons for the claims;

(b) Judgment based on constructive confession: Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act.

3. Determination as to the claim against Defendant lot damage insurance company

A. According to the facts acknowledged prior to the occurrence and scope of liability for damages, and the evidence listed therein, the instant accident is intended to attempt an illegal internship without securing sufficient safety distance while driving a vehicle parked on the side.