beta
Text
Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for five years.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[2013 Highest 960, 1029(combined)] Defendants are inter-speaks.
The Defendants, who are G owners of H, I, J, and K land of approximately 8,800 square meters, are land owned and traded at high prices, and are making an intermediate omission registration due to tax issues, etc., they were willing to acquire the property from the elderly victims L at the time of 80 years old.
Defendant
A around February 10, 2009, at the victim’s house located in Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si M, the victim stated that “I will exchange the reported price of KRW 1280,000,000 with H in terms of forests and fields. The reported price is KRW 1280,000,000,000,000 adjacent to the road, and other people should promptly set the price in advance of fraud. In addition, I would like to exchange the Plaintiff’s market price of KRW 150,000,000,000,000,000,000,000, as the market price owned by the President (hereinafter referred to as the “victim”) is KRW 150,000,00 with H on the face of Notes.”
Defendant
B followed, the victim was able to grow up with the owner of the above H land.
However, the above H land is a development restriction zone, and according to the officially announced price as of January 2012, the total of KRW 5,620 per square meter ( KRW 1,700 per square meter) is merely 49,456,000 ( KRW 5,620 x 8,800) per square meter, and the price was lower than that of the above land owned by the victim based on the officially announced land price, not only was 1/10 to 1/25 but also the land adjacent to the road.
In addition, Defendant B entered into only a sales contract with the actual owner of the above H land to purchase KRW 130 million from G, and thus, Defendant B was not the owner of the above H land, and the above H land was also thought to receive money from the victim, and even after the payment of the above H land was made, Defendant B was thought to transfer the land and money owned by the victim to another person. Thus, even if the land and money owned by the victim were received from the victim, there was no intent and ability to transfer the above H land to the victim.
Defendants.