logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.04.21 2015고단846
개인정보보호법위반
Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by a fine of 100,000 won;

2. If the defendant does not pay the above fine, fifty thousand won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From July 8, 2007 to August 31, 2014, the Defendant, while serving as the director of the “B” apartment management office, managed the personal information of the occupants, such as managing the identification number certificate stating the name, date of birth, and address, which is the personal information of C, the chairman of the council of occupants’ representatives of the above apartment complex, on duty.

On June 26, 2014, at around 13:56, the Defendant instructed D, who is an accounting officer of the above management office, to participate in the evaluation of the occupant satisfaction conducted by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport under the name of C, and entered the name, gender, age, type of residence, and residential apartment into the multi-family housing management information system of E, and following C:

Accordingly, the Defendant conspired with D to use C personal information beyond the purpose of collecting personal information.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding E;

1. Application of the police protocol law to C

1. Subparagraph 2 of Article 71 of the Personal Information Protection Act and Article 18 (1) of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of a selective fine (not for reflective and personal interest but for personal interest, taking into account the fact that it was designed to serve a written demand of the competent Gu office and that it has no criminal record of the same kind of punishment or suspended execution or heavier punishment);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow