Defendant shall be sentenced to six months of imprisonment, and the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On March 18, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 01:35 on March 18, 2016, at the street room in Gwangju Northern-gu D convenience stores, and (b) on the 112th day from a taxi engineer, the Defendant: (c) “Iskick F, a slope belonging to the Seoul Northern Police Station Evise, called “Isk f, off and sticked with the police clothes,” (c) “Isk f, off and sticked with the police clothes,” (d) “Isk f,” and “Isk flick flick flick flick,” (e.g., at around 01:55 on the same day, the Defendant voluntarily moved to the E zone located in Gwangju Northern-gu, Gwangju, with the notification of 112, and “Isk flick flick flick flick flick.”

"Afinite, there is a finite, this finite, and this finite, and assaulted the chest of slope F to the right shoulder."

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning dispatch and criminal investigation by police officers' 112 report.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect to the public prosecutor and the police accused;

1. Each statement made to the police with H and F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to investigate and report the submission of CCTV video recording CDs;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence [the scope of the recommended sentence] The grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act [the scope of the recommended sentence] interference with the performance of official duties, and the scope of the special mitigation area (one month to eight months), [the special mitigation person], where the degree of violence, intimidation, and deceptive scheme is minor, the non-exclusive penalty (the case where one type, serious injury has occurred] [the decision of the sentence] Defendant recognized the crime of this case, and is divided in depth.

In light of the details of the instant case and the degree of violence, although the case is not hot, there are many criminal records against the Defendant due to violence, and in particular, six criminal records were punished for obstruction of public duty or damage to public goods.

The damaged police officer does not want to punish the defendant.

In addition, considering all the circumstances regarding sentencing, it is ordered as a whole.