Text
1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. The Plaintiff Incheon City Tourism Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Plaintiff Co., Ltd”) owned a lot of land 504-7, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon, and operated the Songdoo Park in the above land.
B. On October 10, 201, the Mayor of Yeonsu-gu Incheon Metropolitan City (hereinafter “instant project”) approved and publicly notified the development plan for the Yeonsu-gu Incheon Metropolitan City Tourist Complex (No. 201-259 of the Incheon Metropolitan City’s notification), including the land owned by the Plaintiff Company, with respect to the whole zone of the Yeonsu-gu Incheon Metropolitan City Sports Complex (hereinafter “instant project”), and designated the Incheon Tourism Corporation (hereinafter “Macheon City Corporation”) as the project implementer.
C. When the Plaintiff Company closed the Songdo Recreation Park as a result of the instant project, from March 2013, it leased part of the Plaintiff’s land (hereinafter “instant land”) to the Plaintiff Youngjin Corporation, Inc. (hereinafter “Yjin”) and the professional car company (hereinafter “prokz”), and Plaintiff Youngjin Corporation and professional car company sublet the leased land to the remainder of the Plaintiff, a seller of the leased land. The rest of the Plaintiffs began to install containers on the instant land for the purpose of using them for the office’s purpose while engaging in the instant secondary car sales business.
On April 1, 2013, the Defendant discovered 20 containers installed on the ground of the instant land, and issued a corrective order to voluntarily remove the containers to the Plaintiff Company, Youngjin Construction Corporation, and professional carzers. Nevertheless, on April 11, 2013, the number of containers increased to 80, the Defendant issued a corrective order to re-examine the 20 unit containers prior to the order to take corrective measures, issued a corrective order on the newly established 60 unit containers, and issued a corrective order on April 23, 2013.
E. However, inasmuch as the Plaintiff Company, Youngjin Corporation, and professional car-based continued to comply with the Defendant’s corrective order, the Defendant was established on April 26, 2013 with respect to the Plaintiff Company and Youngjin Corporation until that time.