Defendant

A Imprisonment for 2 years, 2 months, and 4 months, and 3 months, respectively, shall be punished by imprisonment for 8 months, and 4 months.

(b).

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

C On October 17, 2013, the Seoul Southern District Court sentenced 6 months of imprisonment with prison labor for special larceny and 2 years of suspended execution. On October 25, 2013, the judgment became final and conclusive.

1. The circumstances leading to the fraud of insurance money and the criminal defendant A, when there were insufficient money to be used for entertainment expenses such as gambling, etc., the accident was caused by intentionally taking advantage of the vehicles operated by a third party acting in good faith by inducing contact, causing the accident, or failing to commit the accident, or causing the intentional accident by threatening each other, or by threatening each other between the accomplice and the accomplice, and then the accident was committed by deceiving the insurance company under the name of the accomplice who was aware of the fact that the accident was committed in the vehicle involved, or the accomplice who did not actually board the vehicle in question, and by deceiving the insurance company to pay the insurance money, the insurance money was collected by pretending the insurance accident to the name of the insurance company or the accomplice who did not board the vehicle involved.

Specific Facts of crime

A. Defendant A in collusion with H and I on June 10, 2013, there was no fact that Defendant A had been met in the Bupyeong-gu Incheon Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, and Defendant A was driving a Jcoon car even though there was no accident itself.

H pretended as if he had concealed the KM5 car that he driven with I while taking advantage of I, and around that time, he received the insurance accident with the victim Hansung Damage Insurance Co., Ltd. and received 1,920,190 won with insurance money and acquired it by fraud, as shown in the following table, three times from February 20, 2012 to the above temporary date.

On February 20, 2011, written indictment No. 20:10 on February 20, 201, 201, in the case of the defendant's accomplice's accomplice's claim amount of insurance money (for example, the amount received), the victim's accomplice's charge (for example, the amount received) appears to be a clerical error.

Even if the defendant A L L in the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Incheon and the following accident did not occur, the defendant A and L were committed in collusion with the defendant to receive L in MM5 car, and the insurance money was claimed on June 7, 2013, the defendant A NO in Yeonsu-gu, Incheon P P P.