All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The sentence imposed by the lower court (three years of the suspended sentence of one year and six months) is too unreasonable.

B. The above sentence declared by the prosecutor by the court below is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. The lower court rendered a sentence by taking into account the circumstances unfavorable to the Defendant, as well as favorable to the Defendant.

When comprehensively taking into account the conditions for sentencing and the applicable sentences in the trial, the sentencing judgment of the court below exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion.

There is no other circumstance in which it is deemed unfair to maintain the judgment of the court below as it is (see Supreme Court Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015). In addition, considering the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence of the court below cannot be deemed unfair because it is too heavy or too unreasonable.

Therefore, each argument by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is dismissed pursuant to Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that all of the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor are without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition (Article 25(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that it is obvious that the "before the amendment by Act No. 14245," among the judgment of the court below, is a clerical error in the "before the amendment by Act No. 14525," and thus, it is corrected ex officio pursuant to Article 25(1)