logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2017.06.02 2015구합63227
부당징계구제재심판정취소
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit, including those resulting from the participation, shall be all included.

Reasons

1. A-place of business, including the plaintiffs' workplace and F, that has five regional headquarters (Seoul, Daejeon, Permanent Residence, South, and Busan) under its control, with approximately 34,000 full-time workers working at the diesel Vehicle Team - The Head of the Busan Regional Headquarters, the Chairperson of the Central Committee for Countermeasures against Disputes, the Chairperson of the Central Headquarters, and the Chairperson of the Busan Local Headquarters B- Places of business: The number of participants and employees working at the Public Enterprise E (F), including the organization targets of the public enterprise E (hereinafter referred to as the "F"), and the members of the organization of the public enterprise E (hereinafter referred to as the "F"), and the members of the organization. The number of members of the organization is about 20,00,00, and the five local headquarters (Seoul, Daejeon, Permanent Residence, and Busan) are located under its jurisdiction, and the plaintiffs and the members of the Central Committee for Countermeasures against Accidents (hereinafter referred to as the "Act No. 2130, Dec. 13, 2012") were removed from office.

(hereinafter referred to as the "Disciplinary Reason of this case". Each entry in the Rules of Employment, Article 6 (Duty of Good Faith), Article 8 (Prohibited Act), Article 32 (Duty of Good Faith), Article 33 (Duty of Good Faith Prohibition), Article 37, Article 38 (Duty of Maintain Dignity) and subparagraphs 1 through 5 of Article 52 (Disciplinary Grounds) of the Rules of Employment, which are the basis of the disciplinary action, the plaintiffs' dismissal of their respective applications for reexamination (hereinafter referred to as "each of the instant Disciplinary Grounds of this case"), subparagraph 1, subparagraph 1, subparagraph 1, Article 12, and subparagraph 13 (including separate numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) of the Rules of Employment, the whole purport of arguments, and the purport of the whole arguments.

2. Whether each of the judgments rendered by the reexamination of this case is legitimate

A. On the grounds delineated below, each of the instant judgments is unlawful.

arrow