A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a rash car B.

On September 4, 2019, at around 09:24, the Defendant driving the said two-lane road in front of the Jeonpo-dong, Busan Metropolitan City on September 4, 2019, and driving the said two-lane along the two-lanes from the c apartment room to the epo-section boundary, and changed the two-lanes to the two-lane.

In such cases, the driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by changing the lane safely by keeping the traffic situation on the left and right.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and changed the two-lanes of the same direction as the occupational negligence, followed by the victim D's D's drive, who was in a critical speed, and faced with the left side of the E's drive of the E's drive, which was faced with the two-lanes of the same direction.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim, such as salt ties and tensions that require approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and at the same time, destroyed the above spke vehicle in a manner that would amount to KRW 1,417,800 of repair cost, but did not immediately stop the vehicle and run away without taking necessary measures, such as aiding the victim.

Summary of Evidence

Witness

D asserts that the Defendant and the defense counsel did not know of the occurrence of the accident at the time of the occurrence of the accident, the report on the legal statement of the traffic accident, the internal investigation report (Attachment of a photo on the shock of the damaged vehicle), the CD (boom image of the damaged vehicle), the quotation, the quotation, the medical certificate, and the investigation report (Attachment of a photo of the

According to the following facts or circumstances acknowledged by evidence, namely, the video recorded in the black box of the victim vehicle, the shocked amount at the time of the occurrence of the accident in this case, and the victim immediately after the shocked, left the door while stopping in the accident site for one time, while the defendant was temporarily stopped and stopped, the vehicle of the victim who stopped.