Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 10, 2015, the Defendant issued an order to “E” restaurant operated by the victim D of the victim D in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City on November 11, 2015, where the Defendant 11:00, 2015, for two sons and three sons of vertebral dye, so that food would be paid to the victim.

However, the defendant had no intention or ability to pay the price even if he was supplied food to the injured party due to the lack of money.

However, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim as above; (b) did not receive food equivalent to KRW 23,000 per share of KRW 23,000 per share of KRW 9,00,000 in the market price from the damaged party; and (c) did not pay the same amount.

2. The defendant who interferes with the business shall take the bit of bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bit, which is the same as the bitch bitch bit.

The inside and outside of the Republic of Korea shall be sold.

There is no money, A.I.D.

Mama Madra

The Doctrine read “,” and the Doctrine caused the disturbance for about 10 minutes, thereby obstructing the victim’s restaurant business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements prepared in D;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (F telephone communications for employees at E cafeterias);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act are as follows: (a) the Defendant, who received notification or received a summary order on several occasions by his or her own initiative, has committed a similar crime continuously.

It seems that the defendant was not aware of the illegality of the previous food without any awareness.

However, the defendant's misunderstandings late, and again does not commit the same crime.

There are many things.

2. The damage of the victim;