All the judgment below against the Defendants is reversed.

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of six months and fines of 5,000,000,000.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

가. 피고인 A 1) 사실오인 피고인 A는 ‘포커’와 ‘블랙잭’ 도박을 하였을 뿐, 카드 앞면의 모양과 숫자를 알 수 있도록 뒷면에 일정한 표시가 되어 있는 속칭 ‘목카드’를 사용하여 사기도박을 한 사실이 없다고 주장한다. 2) 양형부당 피고인 A는 원심의 형(징역 6월 및 벌금 500만 원, 추징 30만 원, 몰수)은 너무 무거워서 부당하다고 주장한다.

B. Defendant D, L1 of mistake of facts, Defendant D, and L merely obtained money by deception due to Defendant A’s fraud and gambling, and they did not have committed gambling (On the other hand, Defendant D, and L asserted that the crime of gambling cannot be established as the victim of Defendant A’s crime of gambling at the second trial date of the trial of the court of the first instance, but it cannot be a legitimate ground for appeal as a subsequent assertion of the period for submitting the grounds for appeal, and as seen below, there is no evidence to acknowledge that Defendant A had committed gambling against Defendant D and L, and there is no evidence to support that Defendant A had committed fraud. Therefore, Defendant D and L’s assertion of misapprehension of legal principles cannot be seen as either vague or without merit.

2) Defendant D and L asserts that the lower court’s respective sentence (Defendant D: a fine of KRW 3 million, Defendant L: a fine of KRW 4 million) is too unreasonable.

C. Defendant B, E, F, H, Defendant B, E, F, H, and I asserts that each of the punishments of the lower court (Defendant B, E: each of the fines of KRW 3 million, KRW 1.980,000,000, KRW 1.980,000, KRW 3.5 million, KRW 3.5 million, KRW 2 million, and KRW 2 million) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

가. 직권판단 검사가 당심에서 제1 원심판결의 공소사실 중 “일명 ‘포커’ 도박을 하는 것처럼”을 “일명 ‘포커’, ‘블랙잭’ 도박을 하는 것처럼”으로 변경하는 내용의 공소장변경 허가신청을 하였고, 이 법원이 이를 허가함으로써 심판대상이 변경되었으므로, 제1 원심판결 중 피고인 A...