Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 26, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. against B in the Daegu District Prosecutors’ Office located in the Daegu Suwon-dong, which was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with labor for the violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. on the Control of Narcotics, etc. on the part of B who provided information about C-related narcotics to the Daegu District Prosecutors’ Office in the last year and provided legal testimony. The Defendant submitted it to the appellate trial division on the ground of the great public nature, the Defendant may be sentenced to imprisonment with labor for up to two months. The Defendant would request the prosecutor who was in charge of the investigation at the time to make it possible to use one million won as expenses, which would change the amount of one million won to be used as expenses, and received from B to the Defendant’s post office account (E) around July 1, 2014.

2. Around July 19, 2014, the Defendant met B at the meeting room of the Daegu Detention House 2 located in the Daegu Suwon-gu Man-dong, and met B, and “I would have no big help in the appellate trial trial. I would like to cooperate with F in the investigation while I would like to inform D of the drug case of 500 grams, which is currently being investigated by the prosecutor of the D, who is in the process of investigation. The additional submission of the drug case to the appellate trial division would be reduced for four months if I would bring the drug case to be made by request of D prosecutor. As I would cause it to change one million won to be used as expenses, I would have received from B to the Defendant’s post office account as stated in the preceding paragraph, around July 22, 2014.”

As a result, the defendant received money and valuables on the pretext of solicitation for cases or affairs handled by public officials.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. Letters of the defendant's written correspondence and correspondence of the civil petition for interview;

1. Recording records;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on transaction confirmation;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 111 (1) of the Attorney-at-Law Act who has selected a sentence, and selection of fines;

1. The Criminal Act among concurrent crimes.