The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (two years of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the judgment of the defendant recognized the crime and against the mistake, and that the defendant was the first offender, and that the defendant was not led to the crime of this case.

However, the crime of single-name “scam” is a crime of acquiring an unspecified number of money in a systematic and systematic manner, and not only the nature of the crime is very high, but also social criticism is high, and these crimes are carried out in a variety of ways through the participation of subordinate officers, such as the withdrawal measures, as well as the general responsibility. The act of withdrawal by the defendant is indispensable for the completion of the crime, and it is highly necessary to strictly punish such simple participation in order to eradicate the crime. The amount of damage in this case exceeds KRW 20 million, the damage in this case is a large amount exceeding KRW 20 million, the damage in this case was not recovered at all, the fact that there is no change in circumstances that need to reduce punishment at the trial, and all other factors that are the sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments of this case, such as the defendant’s age, character and behavior, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., it is not recognized that the punishment

The above argument by the defendant cannot be accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.