A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from Dangerous Driving) is a person engaged in driving automobiles B hosting.

On December 7, 2019, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol level of 0.113% on blood alcohol level on December 23:15, 201, and driven a five-lane road in front of Incheon Seo-gu, Incheon, at a speed of about 114km from the Cheongra to D.

At the time, since the vehicle was stopped in the front door, there was a duty of care to see the front door well for those engaged in driving service, and to operate it safely by accurately operating the steering gear.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to stop in the front of the Defendant’s vehicle due to negligence while neglecting the influence of alcohol, and received the back portion of the FSP car driven by the Victim E (V, 58) from the front part of the Defendant vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant, while driving a motor vehicle in a state where normal driving is difficult due to the influence of drinking, was inflicted on the victim by driving the motor vehicle for about two weeks, resulting in injury such as salt, tension, etc.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) driving a string car under the influence of alcohol by 0.113% from the 6km section from the front of Seo-gu Incheon Metropolitan City G to the front of the same Gu C road at a temporary border, such as paragraph (1) of this Article.

3. The driver of any motor vehicle, etc. who has violated the Road Traffic Act shall not cause any danger or injury to other persons by consecutively committing two or more acts, such as a violation of signal or a violation of the median line, or by continuously and repeatedly committing one act;

Nevertheless, the Defendant, at the same time and place as Paragraph 1, was under the influence of alcohol level of 0.113%, and was under the influence of alcohol level of 0.13% and was under the suspension signal.