logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2017.05.30 2017재두96
도시개발구역지정 및 개발계획수립결정고시
Text

The action for retrial shall be dismissed.

The costs of retrial shall be borne by the plaintiff (Plaintiffs for retrial).

Reasons

Judgment ex officio is made.

The exercise of the right to trial is also regulated by the principle of trust and good faith in order to protect the other party and secure judicial function.

Unless there are special circumstances, it is permissible to re-examine the same request for retrial on the ground that it is obvious that the request for retrial cannot be accepted by law even though the relevant legal relations have already been rejected by the court, and it is not permissible to abuse the right of action.

According to the records, the plaintiff (the plaintiff) had repeatedly filed a petition for retrial against the defendant (the defendant) on the same or similar grounds as the lawsuit of retrial of this case, but has been dismissed or dismissed.

The lawsuit for retrial of this case also contains the same or similar reasons as the previous petition for retrial, which constitutes an abuse of the right of action, and thus is unlawful.

Therefore, the suit of this case is dismissed, and the costs of the retrial are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

arrow