The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentencing of the lower court (one year of imprisonment, confiscation and completion of 80 hours of sexual assault treatment programs) is too large and unreasonable.

2. The judgment is based on the following facts: (a) the Defendant recognized all of the crimes of this case, and against his mistake, etc.

However, the defendant has been punished by imprisonment, suspension of execution and fine several times due to the violation of the Toxic Chemicals Control Act, and the nature of the crime of quasi-indecent acts by force of this case is not good. The defendant committed the crime of the violation of the Toxic Chemicals Control Act during the period of repeated crime, and the defendant did not reach an agreement with the victims of each quasi-indecent act by force of this case up to the trial, and did not look at the circumstances that the defendant faithfully made efforts for the repayment of damage. In full view of all the sentencing conditions as shown in the arguments of this case including the defendant's age, character, character, environment, intelligence and environment, motive and background of the crime, means, method and consequence of the crime, criminal record and circumstances before and after the crime, etc., it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal of this case is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition.