The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (two years and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Various circumstances (each of the crimes of this case committed by the defendant was committed against the defendant during the trial of the judgment of the court below and the trial of the court below. The crimes of this case committed four fire prevention and fire prevention, two injuries, embezzlement, obstruction of performance of official duties, two thefts and night residence intrusion larceny as shown in the facts of the crime in the judgment of the court below. The crime is highly serious in the nature of the crime. In particular, in the case of the crime of fire prevention and attempted fire prevention against the "E" as stated in the judgment of the court below, one flow for cutting and three LPG gas through the above high water and three injury to cause property damage, and the degree of injury suffered by the victim of the crime of injury as stated in the judgment of the court below, and the victim of each of the crimes of this case (excluding K hospital) of this case and the victim of the victim of the crime of this case were punished by a fine for the victim of the crime of this case and the victim of the other crime of this case, which have been punished by the victim of the crime of this case and the victim of the victim of the crime of this case.

In full view of all the sentencing conditions shown in the court below and the trial proceedings at the court below, including the statement, the fact that the damage victim of embezzlement does not want to be punished against the defendant, and that the defendant has no criminal record of imprisonment without prison labor or any heavier punishment, etc., the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable since the sentence imposed by the defendant is too unreasonable.