logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2018.07.11 2017가단394
대여금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

On November 9, 2011, the Plaintiff asserted that the Defendant lent KRW 70 million to the Defendant on November 29, 201 by setting the deadline, and that the Defendant did not borrow money.

However, Gap evidence No. 1, the only evidence submitted by the plaintiff, has no evidence to acknowledge the authenticity of the petition.

Rather, comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the pleadings in the statement Nos. 3 and 4 of the evidence, C (tentative name D) living together by the Defendant around 2011, forged and exercised the above loan certificate.

It is recognized that the summary order was issued on January 4, 2018 by the Chuncheon District Court 2017 High Court and approximately 4154 on January 4, 2018.

Since there is no evidence to acknowledge the Plaintiff’s assertion that the Defendant borrowed money from the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff’s claim is dismissed.

arrow