logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2014.11.06 2014노642
범인도피교사등
Text

Defendant

All appeals filed by A and prosecutor are dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Defendant A did not engage in a business of exchanging results obtained through the use of game products in collusion with Defendant E or F.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty of violating the Game Industry Promotion Act among the facts charged against the defendant is erroneous and adversely affected by the judgment.

B. According to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor against Defendant A, it is sufficiently recognized that Defendant A had M escape the criminal defendant himself/herself who committed a violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act. Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below that acquitted Defendant B of this part of the facts charged is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts and adversely affected the conclusion of the judgment. According to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor against Defendant B, the fact that Defendant engaged in a business of exchanging results acquired through the use of game products is sufficiently recognized.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below that found this part of the facts charged as not guilty is erroneous and adversely affected by the conclusion of the judgment.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by Defendant A, the lower court determined that the Defendant was guilty of violating the Act on Promotion of the Game Industry of the Defendant, on the ground that, in full view of the following circumstances, the lower court determined that: (a) the Defendant was only trusted in terms of having specific grounds; and (b) in full view of various circumstances recognized by the above evidence, the Defendant was found to have operated the instant game site as indicated in the facts charged, as stated in the facts charged, in collusion with E; and (c) accordingly, determined that the charge of violating the Act on Promotion of the Game Industry of the Defendant was guilty.

(1) I shall set forth in the court below the electric utility or rent issues between the defendant and E.

arrow