logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원평택지원 2016.11.04 2016가단8515
물품대금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The Plaintiff’s gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion: (a) from September 2015, supplied freezing food to the Defendant’s Maart operated by the Defendant, and paid KRW 10,000,00 as sales deposit to the Defendant; and (b) KRW 7,860,333 as sales deposit; (c) the amount of goods not paid by the Defendant was KRW 12,10,012 (hereinafter “price for the instant goods”); and (d) against the Defendant, the Plaintiff claimed against the Defendant the payment of the above sales deposit and event expenses; (b) the total amount of the sales deposit and event expenses; and (c) the amount of unpaid goods (i) KRW 29,960,345 (= KRW 10,00,000, KRW 7,860, KRW 3333,00, KRW 12,100

2. Determination

A. The Plaintiff paid money to the Defendant under the pretext of the salesroom deposit and event support expenses, only the evidence presented by the Plaintiff, which was presented by the Plaintiff, to the Defendant.

It is insufficient to recognize that there was an agreement to return it later, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

Therefore, this part of the plaintiff's assertion is without merit.

B. According to the overall purport of the statement and pleadings on the portion of the price for the goods unpaid in the instant case, the Defendant paid KRW 12,100,012 to the Plaintiff on June 13, 2016 as the price for the goods unpaid in the instant case. Thus, the Plaintiff’s assertion on this part is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow