logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.10.26 2017고단6291
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)등
Text

Defendant

A In four months of imprisonment, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 3,00,000 won, and Defendant C by a fine of 2,00,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The joint crime committed by Defendant A and B [the violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint injury)] on April 6, 2017 on the ground that the Defendants, around 00:50 on April 6, 2017, in the “E” singing room located in the Namdong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, where the victim F (36 taxes) and the body were faced, they were committed.

시비를 하던 중 피고인 A는 피해자 G(36 세) 의 뒤에서 팔로 목을 조르고, 주변에 있던 화분을 집어 던지고, 계속하여 피해자 H( 여, 37세) 의 다리를 발로 걷어차고, 피고인 B는 이에 가세하여 피해자 F의 뒤에서 목을 조르며 낭 심을 손으로 잡고, 피해자 H의 다리를 걷어찼다.

As a result, the Defendants jointly inflicted injury on the victim H such as both slots, which requires treatment for about 14 days, and the victim F, on the diversal coordinates, which require treatment for about 14 days, and on the victim G, such as divers, divers, tensions, etc. requiring treatment for about 14 days.

2. The Defendants jointly commit a crime (Interference with the performance of official duties) by the Defendants at the singing room around 01:00 on the same day on the same day with four male members and fighting.

“After receiving the report of 112, Defendant B, a police official of the Incheon Southern Police Station I District Police Station, was continuously pushed back at the scene at the time of arrival of the police officers and five other police officers belonging to the Seoul Southern Police Station, and notified Defendant A of his intention to arrest a flagrant offender. The Defendant A was able to continue to take a police officer, scam the police officer, and scam his cellular phone, followed Defendant A’s behavior that seems to be at the time of their navigation. Defendant B, a police officer belonging to the Incheon Southern Police Station I District of Police Station, was scambling with Defendant B, who was under his duty to take the part of the police officer, and was under his duty to take the part of the police officer, and was under his duty to take part in the police officer’s duty to take part in the police officer’s duty to take part in the police officer’s duty to take part in the police officer’s duty to take part in the police officer’s duty to take part in the police officer’s duty to take part in the police.

arrow