A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Punishment of the crime

On February 8, 2006, the Defendant was sentenced to five years of imprisonment for the commission of indecent act by force at Busan High Court due to indecent act by force. On October 7, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to seven years of an attachment order of location tracking device in the sex support of the Daegu District Court. On November 12, 2010, the Defendant completed the execution of the sentence in the Ganbuk Vocational Training Prison on November 2, 201.

The defendant of "2014 Highest 8276" is a person subject to probation and the execution of an order to attach an electronic tracking device from November 12, 2010.

1. A person who has any electronic device attached in violation of his/her duty to maintain the utility of an electronic tracking device shall not arbitrarily separate the electronic device from his/her body during the period of electronic device attachment, damage, interfere with its propagation, alter data received, or otherwise impair its utility;

A. On December 5, 2010, from around 15:02 to around 15:20, the Defendant, who left the scope of the attachment device, moved without carrying a portable tracking device for about 18 minutes and caused a escape warning of the attachment scope, thereby preventing the tracking of a normal location by causing a escape warning of the attachment device. Moreover, from around that time to July 22, 2014, the Defendant maintained the utility of the electronic device by making it impossible to maintain the function of the device normally by the same method nine times, such as the list of crimes, in the same manner as the list of crimes.

B. On March 15, 201, from around 10:22 to 10:26, the Defendant lost the signal of the portable tracking device, the Defendant did not charge the portable tracking device so that the use of the electronic tracking device could not be normally displayed by means of leaving all of the portable tracking device out and making it impossible for the competent probation office to grasp the location of the Defendant at the location of the Defendant. Moreover, from around that time to October 28, 2013, the Defendant lost the effectiveness of the electronic tracking device by causing the signal of the portable tracking device missing in the same way eight times, as indicated in the list of crimes in the attached Form.

2. Act on Probation, Etc., of persons wearing an electronic device or persons on probation who violate matters to be observed;