logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2013.10.24 2013고단3469
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a car in Dro-car.

On June 25, 2013, the Defendant driven the above car on June 25, 2017:07:15, and turned back the sidewalk of BMW oil station in front of the border water area in Suwon-si, Suwon-si.

At the same time, there are two different places between the sidewalk and the roadway, and there are victims E (77 years of age) on the sidewalk, so a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents by checking the front, rear, and right and the left and right of the roadway on the road that is divided between the sidewalk and the roadway.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to report and got the victim to go beyond the floor by taking the victim as a part subsequent to the above vehicle due to the negligence of the Defendant's failure to do so, and led the victim to go beyond the floor, and the said vehicle was proceeding in the future, leading the victim to the passenger car of the second defendant.

As a result, the Defendant, by the above occupational negligence, caused the victim to die in the same place due to a large amount of blood thick, etc., but did not immediately stop and escape without taking necessary measures, such as aiding the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning autopsys;

1. Article 5-3 (1) 1 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. The punishment shall be determined as ordered in consideration of the matters prescribed in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, including the following: (a) the reason for sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act; (b) there is no criminal record against the Defendant; (c) the Defendant’s driver’s vehicle is covered by a comprehensive insurance; (d) the Defendant’s report was invaded; and (e) the Defendant committed a crime again during the course

arrow