beta
Text
1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;
2. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
3. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
At around 20:30 on April 1, 2016, the Defendant asserted that the Plaintiff was the Plaintiff’s assertion, which was parked on the street near Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D (hereinafter “the instant OE”), attempted to block EE (hereinafter “the instant OE”). In that process, the instant OE was excessively subdivided into OE’s kyke and damaged the instant OE’s kyke case, and thereby, the Plaintiff suffered a loss equivalent to KRW 820,000 on the repair cost.
Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay 820,000 won and damages for delay due to tort to the plaintiff.
While the defendant asserted that the defendant was waiting for the cafeterias in the vicinity of the above plaintiff's argument, he was only trying to cut off the above Austrias into the fluoral seat, and there was no attempt to cut off the above Austrias or put them into the fluoral seat.
Judgment
The Defendant filed a complaint with the Defendant on April 1, 2016 for attempted larceny and for the charge of damage, and the Defendant filed a complaint with the purport that “In the course of the investigation, the Plaintiff may make a statement to the effect that, (a) the Plaintiff accepted the instant part of the instant OE Ba in G management of F on April 5, 2016, the part of the instant OE Ba Ga Ga Ga Ga Ga Ga Ga Ka, and paid KRW 820,000 to F at its repair cost; (b) the Plaintiff filed a complaint with the Defendant on May 9, 2016 for attempted larceny and for the charge of damage; and (c) in the process of the investigation, F may be recognized to the effect that, in the event that the Plaintiff continues to use the LE Ka Ka Ka Ka Ka Ka Ka Ka Ka Ka Ka Ka Ka Ka Ka Ka Ka Ka Ka Ka Ka Ka Ka Ka Ka Ka Ka Ka Ka Ka Ka Ka Ka , where the Plaintiff Ka Ka Ka .”
However, the circumstances revealed in Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 3, i.e., the overall purport of the pleadings, and ① The plaintiff was 4 days after April 1, 2016, which was the date of the occurrence of the instant case.