logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2021.03.31 2020구단55155
요양불승인처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. From March 12, 2018, Plaintiff (B) served as a fixed-term worker in C Corporation as D Center manager (operator) and performed duties such as public relations on solar energy, education, and technical administration.

B. On January 26, 2019, the Plaintiff was diagnosed of the acute response to stress, disability in the commencement and maintenance of the water surface (influence), uneasiness, and tensions (hereinafter “the instant injury”) and applied for medical care benefits to the Defendant by asserting that the instant injury was caused or re-influent due to the incidental dismissal of C Corporation caused by the employees’ gathering of “A around January 26, 2019.”

In light of the submitted data, etc., if the Plaintiff shows symptoms, such as apprehensions, depressions, disability in the surface of the water, and considering that the Plaintiff’s statement, etc. that could feel a threat to his/her life was not confirmed, it is reasonable to view that the Plaintiff’s diagnosis name, which corresponds to the Plaintiff’s symptoms, is reasonable, “emergency stress response” is not reasonable, and “easy disability” is “easy disability,” and “the commencement and maintenance of the water surface (influence)” as the remainder of the applicant’s disease is included in the symptoms caused by anxiety disorder.

In light of the fact that the Plaintiff filed a petition for remedy and received a decision of unfair dismissal on the ground that “the cause and time of dismissal before the termination of the contract was not notified in writing,” and that there was stress in the process. However, from July 2015 to July 2018, the details of the benefits for the medical care of the health insurance, etc., the Plaintiff confirmed the details of treatment that the Plaintiff received on a intermittent basis due to the injury to the disease of “satisfy disability”, “satisfy disability”, “matfy disability”, “latfy disability”, “latfy disability”, “latfy disability”, which is the applicant’s disease, is insufficient to prove the mother’s or other harassment, etc., rather than the occupational factor.

arrow