Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. At around 18:00 on September 1, 2016, the Defendant interfered with his duties: (a) on the main point of “F” operated by the victim E in Dong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City (hereinafter “F”); (b) on the ground that “the victim is unable to make drinking by making a promise to do so; and (c) on the ground that “the victim is another one,” he opened a door to dynas, if you drink and drink inside, she would dynas and interfere with his business for 2 hours at this time; and (d) the Defendant got out of the main place to report the victim to the police; and (d) he again returned to approximately 1 hour after the removal of the victim and the victim, she would be unable to do so by the force of the victim, including me, me, me, me, me, me, and she would be unable to do so until 2 years after the end of this time.”
2. At around 19:00 on the same day, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties by the police officers on the spot by assaulting the victim’s face at one time due to defective drinking, when soliciting the Defendant to return home at the G District of the Incheon Jung-gu Police Station G District, which was called upon upon receipt of a report, and by assaulting the victim’s face at one time.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Application of each police protocol of statement to H and E;
1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;
1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;
1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order;
1. Scope of recommendations according to the sentencing criteria;
A. The obstruction of the performance of official duties (the scope of recommendations) shall be type 1 (the obstruction of the performance of official duties and the coercion of official duties).