Defendant shall be punished by a fine of eight million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving Obaba in B.

On July 16, 2019, the Defendant driven the above vehicle around 09:45, and driven the front road of Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C along the one-lane between the lusian street and the three-lane between the lusian street.

On the other hand, there is a crosswalk where signal lights are installed, so in such a case, it is necessary to confirm whether a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to reduce the speed of the person engaged in driving of the motor vehicle and to check whether he/she is a person driving the crosswalk in good manner, and to safely drive the motor vehicle according to the traffic signal

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and went beyond the right side of the victim D (the age of 40) who dried the crosswalk in accordance with the new code on the left side of the direction of the Otoba in the direction of the above Otoba by negligence going beyond the front part of the above Oba.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered from the injury of the victim, due to the above occupational negligence, in the right-side lap of the upper end, which requires medical treatment for about 12 weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and the actual investigation report on the traffic accident;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of statutes on field photographs;

1. Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (1), Article 3 (2) 1 and 6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning Criminal Facts, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order has violated the signal and caused a traffic accident to shock the victim who has dried a crosswalk pursuant to the pedestrian signals by negligence in violation of the duty to protect pedestrians in the crosswalk, resulting in the victim's injury requiring medical treatment for about 12 weeks. The defendant's negligence is heavy.