logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.11.27 2013가합7740
조합원분담금 등 반환
Text

1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiffs are the parties 1) The apartment of the N'N's regional housing association (hereinafter "the apartment of this case") to be newly built on the land of Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government M.

2) The tentatively named Association (hereinafter referred to as the tentatively named Association) shall be

2) The Defendant Domino chips Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Domino chips”) is a company that entered into the instant provisional name association and the agency business service contract, and the Defendant Domino chips Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Domino chips”) are as follows.

The company is scheduled to be a contractor of the apartment of this case, which will be newly constructed by entering into a business agreement such as paragraph (1).

B. The plaintiffs joining the instant association and entering into an agency contract of the instant association signed an agreement on the date of each of the pertinent agreements listed in attached Table 1 List 1 (1) with the instant provisional association and the Defendant Do chip, and the instant provisional association, and paid the members’ contributions, etc., and purchase one household of the instant apartment complex (the Plaintiffs 1, 2, 4 through 7, 9 through 12, respectively, shall be 34 square meters, 3, and 8, respectively), but each of the instant collective agreements and the agency contracts (hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant agreements”) with which Defendant Do Do chip shall act on behalf of the Defendant Do chip. The main contents are as stated in attached Table 2.

C. After entering into each of the instant contracts, the Plaintiffs paid contributions to members and business promotion expenses deposited the pertinent business promotion expenses in the account in the name of Defendant Dono chips listed in attached Table 1 (2) as stated in each of the relevant dates, and the contribution of each of the relevant members listed in attached Table 1 (4) by each of the relevant dates listed in attached Table 1 (5) in the name of Defendant Dono chips.

The progress of the new apartment construction project of this case and the current status of the new apartment construction project of this case are originally P.

arrow