The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts) is that the Defendant did not sell alcoholic beverages to customers in the singing practice place, and F did not enter the above singing practice place. However, since E et al. purchased beer and brought in to the beer and did not know that they were drinking, the Defendant did not constitute a violation of the Music Industry Promotion Act.

2. The lower court also asserted the same purport as the grounds for appeal, and the lower court determined that “the Defendant did not directly purchase beer in light of the circumstances as indicated in its reasoning” in determining “A” to provide alcoholic beverages that are prohibited by a singing practice business operator.

Even if it is recognized that alcoholic beverages have been supplied in a singing practice place,

The above argument was rejected after the judgment.

However, according to the circumstances described in the court below, the following circumstances acknowledged by the records, namely, F, the prosecutor's office, "F has to contact the Defendant with the Defendant," and the Defendant has been aware of "B," etc., and the Defendant demanded to make it only, and the Defendant agreed to create a new tin-to-date and an over-date and to receive a singing-to-date with the Defendant inside, and agreed to do so. The Defendant was aware that E, etc. had been aware of the fact that "B," and the Defendant had been aware of the fact that E, etc. had been in drinking. In light of the fact that the Defendant did not sell alcoholic beverages to E, etc., even if the Defendant did not have sold it, the Defendant silented the act of drinking in a singing practice, and such an implied act constitutes an act prohibited under the Music Industry Promotion Act, and the judgment of the court below that the act constitutes an act of offering alcoholic beverages under the same Act is not acceptable.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. Thus, the defendant's appeal is without merit.