logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2018.12.21 2017나9340
손해배상(기)
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Relevant Defendants of the parties are doctors who operate Gsan Medical Center (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”) in Busan District F, and Plaintiff A is a person born at the above hospital on the H date, and Plaintiff B and C is the parents of Plaintiff A.

B. The Defendant hospital’s assistant nurse’s disease 1) The name-free assistant nurse working in the newborn baby room at the Defendant hospital (hereinafter “Defendant hospital’s assistant nurse”).

(2) On June 25, 2014, the Defendant hospital was diagnosed as non-activity tuberculosis in the regular health examination conducted in June 2013. (2) On June 25, 2014, the assistant nurse of the Defendant hospital received regular health examinations conducted by the Defendant hospital under the National Health Insurance Act, and the Defendant hospital requested to read the results of the chest X-ray shooting in I and on July 4, 2014, the Defendant hospital notified the Defendant hospital of the result that the activity of the Defendant was uncertain as the “popical tuberculosis in the left-hand side in which the activity is uncertain.”

The defendant hospital requested an additional inspection to the I, and the CT photographing test conducted on July 8, 2014, conducted on the IG on the IG test conducted on the IG test conducted on July 8, 2014, diagnosed the tuberculosis as a tuberculosis patient, and diagnosed the tuberculosis disease as a contagious tuberculosis patient on July 15, 2014.

3 In July 8, 2014, the Defendant Hospital excluded the assistant nurse of the Defendant Hospital from his duties, who was diagnosed as a tuberculosis in the CT photography test.

(c) In a public health clinic in Busan-gu, the measures following the diagnosis of the nurse of the defendant hospital, the assistant nurse of the defendant hospital conducted the examination of the relevant assistant nurse on July 20, 2014, based on the diagnosis that he/she was diagnosed as a tuberculosis patient, and conducted the examination of the relevant assistant nurse on the internal diagnosis on July 20, 2014; and the same year from April 9, 2014 to be anticipated to have contacted with the said assistant nurse

7. up to August, the Defendant hospital conducted a medical examination of whether the newborn baby born at the Defendant hospital and the child involved were infected with tuberculosis.

Plaintiff

A.

arrow