logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2017.04.28 2016고단1188
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

The defendant pays 1,7640,000 won to the applicant through fraud.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant 1188, on July 2015, Defendant 2016, paid KRW 30,000,000,000,000 from “F” in the “F” management of the victim D, which was in F, E, for the first and second day of July, 2015, obtained a lot of profits from auctioning real estate to the victim. In this context, Defendant 2 would be paid KRW 30,000,000,000,000,000,000 won.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not obtain profits from the auction of real estate at the time, and did not have any intention or ability to pay the above money with the proceeds of auction even if he borrowed the money from the damaged party, because the Defendant did not obtain profits from the auction of real estate without any particular occupation, and was planned to use the money from the damaged party as a living expense.

Nevertheless, the Defendant received 100,000 won from the injured party for the purpose of auctioning real estate at the seat, i.e., delivery of 10,000 won from around that time to February 7, 2016, and received 17,640,000 won in all over 195 times, such as the list I of crimes committed in attached Table 1.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim to take the property by deceiving the victim.

around January 25, 2012, Defendant 249 is the victim’s “I” operated by the victim H in Seo-gu, Gwangju on January 25, 2012, “a person who owns 12 ships and operates a ship business.”

If you lend money to B, you will re- lend the money to another person and pay interest equivalent to the interest on the second half of each month from that person to the other person.

In addition, the principal will be repaid until May 25, 2012.

“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not own a ship for lack of any particular income, and even if he borrowed money from the injured party, he did not have any intention or ability to pay it, because he did not pay a debt equivalent to KRW 200,000,000, which was urged by creditors.

arrow