logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2017.07.13 2017가단1427
소유권확인
Text

1. The defendant confirms that the plaintiffs are co-owners of 1/9 shares of each of the real estate listed in the separate sheet.

2...

Reasons

1. The following facts do not conflict between the parties, or can be acknowledged in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings as to Gap evidence No. 1, Gap evidence No. 2, Gap evidence No. 3, and Eul evidence No. 4, and there is no counter-proof.

Attached Form

On May 25, 1970, the Chuncheon District Court received No. 2249 on May 25, 1970 with respect to the real estate listed in the list (hereinafter “instant real estate”) and filed for the registration of ownership transfer with respect to the joint ownership of one- nine shares, respectively.

(hereinafter “instant transfer registration”). B.

Of co-owners following the registration of transfer of ownership of this case, A’s address is Hongcheon-gun C, and B’s address is Hongcheon-gun D.

C. A’s registration number is indicated as “E” and B’s registration number is indicated as “F” in the co-owners’ list of land cadastre of the instant real estate.

Plaintiff

A’s resident registration number is “G”, and Plaintiff B’s resident registration number is “H”.

E. On December 20, 1968, Plaintiff A transferred to Chuncheon City I on July 28, 1980, but transferred to SwitzerlandJ on July 28, 1980. At present, Plaintiff B transferred the resident registration domicile to Gohap-gu Seoul on May 27, 1978, and Plaintiff B transferred the resident registration domicile to YY-gu Seoul on May 27, 1978. The resident registration domicile currently is Yangcheon-gu Seoul.

F. The Plaintiffs were born in the Hongcheon-gun N, Gangwon-do N, and the permanent domicile of Plaintiff A is the Hongcheon-gun, Gangwon-do N, and the permanent domicile of Plaintiff B is the Hongcheon-gun, Gangwon-do D.

2. Determination

A. The plaintiffs asserted that the plaintiffs' assertion is co-owners of the ownership transfer registration of this case for the real estate of this case. Since the plaintiffs' transfer of ownership is not made to a third party of share in the real estate of this case on the ground that their addresses are inconsistent with the plaintiffs' addresses entered in the register of real estate register of real estate of this case, the plaintiffs' claim that the defendant is obligated to confirm that the real estate of this case is co-owners of

(b)The following facts shall be established between the Parties:

arrow