1. Defendant (Appointed Party) shall: (a) Plaintiff H KRW 900,000; (b) J of the Appointed; and (c) K to Plaintiff A, respectively, KRW 900,00; and (d) Plaintiff C.

1. The following facts may be found either in dispute between the parties or in the entry of evidence A No. 9, by integrating the purport of the entire pleadings:

On February 11, 2008, the status S Housing Redevelopment Partnership of the parties had been implementing the redevelopment project by employing the plaintiff A, B, C, R, D, E, F, and G with the authorization of the project implementation on February 11, 2008. The plaintiff H is the general affairs of the above partnership.

The defendant (designated parties) and the designated parties are members of the above partnership, and they oppose the above redevelopment project.

B. At around 16:40 on July 28, 2008, the Defendant (Appointed Party) committed the crime against Plaintiff H by the Defendant (Appointed Party) at the above partnership office, where Plaintiff H was working on the third floor of U.S., 16:40 on July 28, 2008, as a matter of whether the Defendant (Appointed Party)’s disclosure of the documents, etc. on which the Defendant (Appointed Party) requested the disclosure of information, the Defendant did not take the Plaintiff H’s pictures by preparing the documents on which the Defendant (Appointed Party) is on his book, and prevented the Defendant (Appointed Party) from gathering the camera on his/her book, which took the Plaintiff’s right hand hand, which the Defendant (Appointed Party) used in the Kameras, and cut the Plaintiff’s Kameras’s right hand, which requires treatment for approximately 21 days, and shouldered the Defendant’s feet and tension, the Defendant’s feet, and the khalle.

C. On September 17, 2008, at around 18:30 on the roads of Gui-si, Gui-si, Gai-si, the Appointor J, K's Appointor J, and C, and K jointly discovered that the victim A and C were employed to publicize the above union's general assembly-related publicity and demand for a written resolution of the redevelopment assembly on the roads of Gui-si, Gai-si, Gai-si, and that the above plaintiffs' street blocking the above plaintiffs' street, "this year has been made", "low-year bank", and "low-year bank feet", while the plaintiff Gap tried to take off a bank that includes the general assembly-related notice, etc., but the plaintiff A did not put a bank, was sealed with the shoulder and clothes of the plaintiff A.