1. The Defendant’s KRW 148,543,91 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from April 24, 2015 to November 22, 2017.

3. According to the appraisal results of the instant case’s damage for the automatic use of SMT, the Plaintiff’s adequate repair cost is KRW 13,00,000,00, as the instant water leakage was damaged due to the instant damage, and thus, the Plaintiff recognized KRW 13,00,00 as the Plaintiff’s damage. (4) According to the appraisal results of the instant construction cost, such as the interior, etc., the entire purport of the pleadings, the Plaintiff’s damage was caused by the instant water leakage, and its adequate repair cost was KRW 15,125,00,00, and the Plaintiff’s damage was recognized as the Plaintiff’s damage.

5) As a result of the appraisal of damages caused by damage to lighting fixtures, etc. in custody, according to the purport of the entire pleadings, the Plaintiff is entitled to KRW 93,00,00 as consolation money due to the leakage of this case, KRW 120,239, street lamps-MPS 120W (products), 200W (products) 200, street lamps-SS 200, 100 W (products) 29, luminous light light-SS 100, 30, 300*120 (raw materials) 596, 26,609,791, which is the value of the damaged goods, as the Plaintiff’s damages (i.e., total amount of KRW 10,000 for consolation money due to the leakage of this case, and the Plaintiff’s claim for consolation money is not accepted as the Plaintiff’s property damages (see Supreme Court Decision 2005Da714501, Feb. 14, 2007).