logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.02.03 2016나958
공사대금등
Text

1. The plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. Facts of premise;

A. On March 7, 2012, F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “F”) entered into a building construction contract with the Defendant (hereinafter “instant new construction project”).

The construction site: The construction cost of 834.14 square meters in Seoul Special Metropolitan City G (Defendant-owned land): 1,058,000,000 won in the portion of the base (excluding value-added tax): 317,000,000 won (excluding value-added tax): 741,00,000 won (excluding value-added tax): Upon completion of the construction project, the above construction was conducted in the order of the completion of the civil aggregate roof of the civil engineering aggregate roof, the artificial colon, and the construction work, and H was treated as a penalty of 239,40,000 won in the construction cost (excluding value-added tax):

Secondly, in relation to the above structural construction, Plaintiff A supplied Lebcon and C supplied steel bars respectively, and Plaintiff D supplied the same part of the above structural construction work, and Plaintiff E supplied the same part of the above structural construction work, respectively.

B. (i) The cumulative amount of the completed inspection records of the construction project in this case was KRW 200,00,000 on June 1, 2012, and KRW 330,000,000 on October 5, 2012. The Defendant paid KRW 100,000,000 on May 22, 2012 to the LAF for the payment of KRW 10,000 on June 29, 2012, and KRW 60,000 on October 16, 2012.

B. On the other hand, H was completed in August 2012 by the K-A-A-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U

On December 10, 2012, 10,000 won (O9. 6,000,000,000 on May 6, 2013, 2013, Plaintiff E 200, 5,000,000 on the date of payment No. 130,000 on the date of payment No. 130,00 on the date of payment No. 130,00 on December 1, 206, this part seems to be substituted for the settlement of construction price to Plaintiff F in lieu of the settlement of construction price due to Plaintiff A’s personal circumstances

Plaintiff

A 10,000,000 won on March 1, 2013

arrow