logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2019.09.05 2019고단1063
특수절도등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a year and six months.

However, for three years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, the above sentence against Defendant A.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is in charge of the management of the sales agency and the orders of goods of the victim (hereinafter “victim”) E (hereinafter “victim”) of Goyang-gu, Gyeyang-gu, Seoul (Seoul) Museum D, and of the headquarters of the Library Specialized Household Sales Group (hereinafter “victim”) from February 22, 2012 to April 12, 2018. On November 21, 2012, a person who established the damaged company under the name of the damaged company F and registered it as the agent of the damaged company and carried out as H of the said G company. Defendant B is a person who was on February 13, 2014 to serve as the managing member of the victimized company from February 13, 2014 to March 23, 2018 and retired.

1. Defendant A

A. On November 30, 2012, the Defendant issued an order of a household amounting to KRW 12,230,900 directly to the victimized company without the business of the said G, but completed the order without the business of the said G, as if household products were sold by the said G, the Defendant made false data, and accordingly, claimed a sales fee to the victimized company in the name of G, and accordingly, received KRW 2,446,180 from that time to February 12, 2018 from that time to February 12, 2018, such as receiving KRW 2,446,180 from the Agricultural Cooperative under the name of F (G) as the sales fee, and acquired KRW 198,89,235 from the victimized company as the sales fee for furniture.

B. On September 13, 2013, the Defendant in occupational breach of trust acquired the pecuniary benefits of KRW 50,869,000 in total on 24 occasions, such as the list of crimes in attached Form - the sum of KRW 50,869,00 in the account of a national bank in the name of F (G) from January 31, 2018, without notifying the damaged company of the production order, even though the Defendant received the order from J as a person in charge of the business management of the victimized company and the management of the order for the ordered household, and directly delivers the order for production to the damaged company, and directly receives the order for production from J to the damaged company, and receives from J as a national bank account in the name of F (G).

arrow