1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On December 31, 2014, the Plaintiff filed a claim with the Defendant for disclosure of the “personal information D and E of the on-site captain (hereinafter “the instant information”) prepared by a police officer (Security Guards B and Assistant C) affiliated with the Port Police Station, after having received a criminal report on January 112, 2012 and confirmed the illegal construction site after having called out the scene after confirming the illegal construction site.”

B. On December 31, 2014, the Defendant deemed that the Plaintiff’s request for disclosure of information was under the jurisdiction of the Posnam Police Station, and the Official Information Disclosure Act (hereinafter “Information Disclosure Act”) on December 31, 2014.

(ii) transferred the Plaintiff’s request for disclosure of information to the coastwise Police Station pursuant to Article 11(4) of the Act.

(hereinafter “instant disposition”). C.

The plaintiff appealed and filed an administrative appeal on March 6, 2015, but the Central Administrative Appeals Commission dismissed the plaintiff's appeal on June 9, 2015.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, entry of Gap Nos. 1 and 2 (including virtual number) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on this safety defense

A. The Defendant’s assertion that the Defendant transferred the Plaintiff’s claim for information disclosure to the Korea Coast Guard, the competent authority, does not directly change the Plaintiff’s specific rights and duties or cause any change in the Plaintiff’s status. As such, the instant disposition does not constitute a disposition that is subject to appeal litigation.

B. Whether a certain act of the judgment administrative agency can be a subject of an appeal cannot be determined abstractly, and a specific and individual decision should be made by taking into account the content and purport of the relevant Act and subordinate statutes, the subject, content, form, and procedure of the act, the actual relation between the act and the disadvantage suffered by interested parties such as the other party, etc., the principle of administration by the rule of law, the attitude of interested parties with the administrative agency related to the pertinent act, etc. (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2010Du7321, Jun. 10, 201). In such a case, the nature and effect