(영문) 청주지방법원 2018.06.27 2018고정35

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 청주지방법원 2018.06.27 2018고정35

특수협박

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who drives Category D another vehicle.

At around 13:50 on November 18, 2017, the Defendant thought on the ground that 43 new Jeju-ro 3 complex was driven by the victim E (54 tax, south) in front of the apartment fCA 110, which was driven by the victim E (54 tax, south) on the front of the apartment fCA 110, and that the river fa10, which was driven by the Defendant, Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si.

The Defendant changed the two-lanes of the apartment 1 to the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the damage Oralato, the damage Oralato the right side of the two-lanes, moving back to the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the Cheongju-si, Nowon-si, while proceeding after the damage Orala to the right side of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the apartment 3-4 main apartment 1, the Defendant brought a threat and injury to the victim by sounding the light of the 3-4 main road over 3-4 times.

[Defendant and defense counsel acknowledged the fact that a horn 3 to 4 occasions, but argued that there was no threat or danger to the victim as stated in the facts charged, but the witness E attempted to pass beyond the Defendant’s way to overtake, and that the witness E knew that it was due to what he would cause the warning.

The witness G, who testified and observed the instant case, was proceeding at a certain speed of Matoba, but the Defendant proceeded with the face at a number of times and Matoba.

In light of the fact that according to the video of the instant case, the Defendant brought a threat and injury to the victim, as stated in the facts constituting an offense, in light of the following: (a) the Defendant: (b) was able to boom the boom on November 18, 2017; (c) 13:49:11 on the 18th day of 2017; and (d) 13:49:25 on the 18th day of 2017; and (c) the Defendant was able to return back to 13:49:25.

As such, the defendant and his defense counsel's above argument is without merit) summary of evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness E and G;

1. The police of E.

유사 판례

-대전지방법원 공주지원 2017.08.25 2017고단211

-창원지방법원 2017.11.09 2017고정779

-울산지방법원 2019.05.03 2018노1205

-청주지방법원 2017.03.23 2017고단267

-광주지방법원 2019.11.21 2019고정630