The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (one year of imprisonment and additional collection of 47 million won) is too unreasonable;

2. In light of the following facts: (a) it is difficult to see that the Defendant intended to arrange for a financial institution by illegal means; (b) it is difficult to see that the Defendant was intended to have been punished against the Defendant; (c) however, the Defendant was an act of disturbing financial order by receiving a total of KRW 47 million with respect to arranging matters concerning the duties of executive officers and employees of financial institutions on three occasions; (d) in light of the amount, the Defendant’s quality is not good; (e) the Defendant actually attempted to act as intermediary; and (e) the Defendant received KRW 80 million with respect to arranging matters concerning the duties of executive officers and employees of financial institution, as in this case, at the Seoul Western District Court on April 1, 2010, considering the fact that the Defendant received KRW 80 million with respect to arranging matters concerning the duties of executive officers and employees of financial institution, the sentence of the lower court is too unreasonable.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit.