Defendant

In addition, the appeal by the person who requested the attachment order is dismissed.

1. The criminal defendant and the person against whom the attachment order was requested (hereinafter “the criminal defendant”) did not commit the instant crime.

2. The judgment is deemed to have filed an appeal regarding the attachment order case under Article 9(8) of the Act on the Probation and Electronic Monitoring, etc. of Specific Criminal Offenders by filing an appeal against the accused case. However, there is no reason to reverse this part ex officio without stating the grounds for appeal or the petition of appeal filed by the accused.

Around 19:41 on August 23, 2013, the Defendant: (a) opened a gate of Asan City C and 201 on the house and intrudes into the house; (b) opened a gate to the victim D (the male and 13 years old) who is a child or youth, who was computer at that place; (c) opened a buck to the left part with the left hand; (d) opened a pluck to the buck of the buck, pluck up to the buck of the victim, etc.; and (d) led the victim, etc. one time with his her knick, and knicked the victim’s knick with his knick; and (d) opened the victim’s knick with his knick, the Defendant knick off the victim’s knick, and knick off the victim’s knch by combining it with the victim’s knick.

The act of inserting the sexual organ into the mouth of the victim by repeating it up to the end and the act of inserting part of the body such as fingers into the victim's resistance.

B. The lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged by comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances:

(1) The injured party, from the investigative agency to this court, takes measures by which the injured party was using a galle and her mother, leads the injured party to his/her inner organ as soon as possible, after he/she saw the injured party into a galle, binding the hand into hand, and then drop the injured party's hand.