The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

1. 공소사실 피고인은 2013. 5. 14. 18:00경 경북 경산시 C회관 2층에서 열린 동대표회의에서 사실은 피해자 D과 E이 불륜관계가 없음에도 불구하고 동 대표자 F, G, H이 듣고 있는 가운데 "경리 그 수준에 봤을 때 그 모자란 부분도 많고, 그러고 좀 너무 배짱 이런 식, 뭐 이런 것도 많고, 그래 이런 것도 우려했는데 소장과 이 경리가 약간 저~ 소장이 더 알아뿌면은 이거 좀 이래 오피스 와이프도 아니고 이거는 뭐"라고 말함으로써 공연히 허위사실을 적시하여 피해자의 명예를 훼손하였다.

2. At the time of the instant case, the Defendant appeared to be present at the same representative meeting in the capacity of I apartment as the representative of I apartment. At the time of the instant case, the principal discussion was to take measures for the acceptance of a letter submitted by E by the apartment management office and the subsequent apartment management method, and the Defendant’s statement in this case objectively interpreted the contents of the instant statement, it is difficult to conclude that the Defendant’s act of using I apartment with the word “I apartment as the representative of the I apartment, not the Lao, but the E and the accounting officer of the Management Office, was negligent in the performance of management affairs at the time of discussion, and it is difficult to conclude that the Defendant’s act of using I apartment with the word “I apartment” was an act of speaking before, after, after, and after, considering the circumstances and circumstances, it is difficult to conclude that the Defendant’s act of stating that I apartment is an inappropriate act of management affairs at the time of the implementation of theme.