(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.01.28 2015고단2713

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.01.28 2015고단2713

교통사고처리특례법위반

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a motor vehicle with sod vehicle of C. C.

On January 3, 2015, the Defendant driven the above car at around 07:25, and proceeded along three-lanes from the four-lanes of the Nowon-gu Nowon-gu Nowon-gu Nowon-gu to the Nowon-gu Nowon-gu Nowon-gu Nowon-gu.

Since there is an intersection where signal lights are installed, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by driving safely according to the name of the driver in such cases.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and went beyond the ground by neglecting the fact that the vehicle driving signal is changed to yellow signal, and due to the negligence of proceeding as is, the Defendant violated the signal from the right side of the off-line to the right side of the madern distance to the right side of the madern. ( South, 73 years old) On the left side of the bicycle driven by the Defendant, the Defendant got the front part of the said car to go beyond the ground.

Ultimately, the suspect caused the victim's death by negligence on January 4, 2015, in light of the above occupational negligence at the emergency room for the movable property hospital in the name of Gyeyang-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, 56.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and a statement of actual investigation;

1. One CD for video recording of black stuffs;

1. A written appraisal of autopsy;

1. A written reply to appraisal (the defendant's defense counsel asserts that there is no relation between the defendant's violation of signal and the person involved in the accident of this case, but considering the victim's unauthorized crossing, it is evident that the accident of this case would not occur if the defendant did not violate signal, and it cannot be seen as an accident that the defendant could not avoid. Thus, the above assertion is without merit.

In addition, the defense counsel asserts that the accident of this case has no relation with the victim's death, but according to the result of the appraisal, the accident of this case causes damage to the victim's status.

유사 판례

-대구지방법원 2016.04.07 2015고단6013

-대구지방법원 2017.10.19 2017고단3214

-대구지방법원 서부지원 2016.02.18 2015고단2024

-대구지방법원 서부지원 2017.10.31 2017고단495

-대구지방법원 서부지원 2016.07.29 2016고단923