The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

The summary of the grounds for appeal by the prosecutor (definite) is the same year as April 23, 2014 by the defendant.

4. Among the contents of the advertisements posted in the Pyeongtaek-si newspaper on 30. 30., the part that "do have been designated as a district with golf adjoining and damaged civil petitioners," "the Cooperative and the Pyeongtaek-si Office have issued an implementation plan under mutual agreement with each other," is false, and the victim I and J who had been a public official in charge of Pyeongtaek-si with the victim H Urban Development Project Association and Pyeongtaek-si have undermined the honor of the victim I and J. However, the court below erred by misapprehending the facts and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment by not guilty of the facts charged in this case.

Judgment

A. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court, and in particular, according to the description of newspaper advertisements, the Defendant was as of April 23, 2014.

4. On 30. 30. 30. 30. 30. It can be recognized that the advertisement “I have been designated as a district with golf adjoining lots, have caused damage to civil petitioners, and the union and Pyeongtaek-si Office have issued authorization of implementation plans in partnership with each other.” (hereinafter “instant newspaper advertisement”).

In the newspaper advertisement of this case, it is directly connected to the part of the "assigning civil petitioners and causing damage," and "the cooperative and Pyeongtaek-si office granted the authorization of implementation plan by combining with each other" that it does not explicitly indicate the premise that the cooperative and Pyeongtaek-si office agreed to do so, and that it does not explicitly indicate the specific fact that "the cooperative and Pyeongtaek-si office agreed to designate the district," and that the contents of the newspaper advertisement of this case were "the public official of Pyeongtaek-si has tried to designate the district by receiving golf loans from the association-related parties, and the opinion that "the civil petition treatment and the authorization of implementation plan was carried out unfairly."