A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 16:00 on April 24, 2016, the Defendant: (a) 16:00, the Defendant: (b) was able to fluorize the victim C (the 53 years of age) (the 53 years of age) who is a fluor in front of the Manyang-si, and D (the fluor 150cm in length, the 100cm in diameter, and the 605,000 won of the fluor fluor’s fluor’s fluor’s fluor’s fluor’s fluor’s fluor’s fluor’s fluor’s fluoral

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and damaged the victim's property.

2. The Defendant suffered special injury, on the ground that the victim D(54 years of age) who was in the same place as the time, time, and place mentioned in Paragraph 1, resisted the Defendant’s act as above, and carried out fat (53Cm in length, approximately 7Cm in diameter) a part of the victim’s back, which is a dangerous object at the same time, was fatd, and fatd with the victim’s left end.

As a result, the defendant carried dangerous objects and carried them about four weeks of medical treatment, which requires two-time medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of police suspect regarding D;

1. Statement of police statement concerning C and F;

1. G statements;

1. On-site photographs;

1. A medical certificate of injury, written confirmation of medical treatment, and prescription;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 258-2 (1), 257 (1) (a point of special injury), and 369 (1) and 366 (a) of the Criminal Act for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Although the contents of the defendant's crime for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act are not good, the fact that the defendant recognized the crime and reflects it, the victims and the victims have never been punished for more than a suspended sentence.