The defendant shall be innocent.

1. On March 10, 2016, the Defendant alleged that D’s house located in Gwangju-si, Gwangju-si, reported that D’s 1,30,000 won was sold by the victim E, and that D’s 1,000 won was sold by the victim E.

“A false representation was made.”

However, the defendant did not intend to pay the amount even if he received a hunting gun from D.

The Defendant received from D, that is, the victim’s market price of 1.3 million won at the victim’s seat, i.e., a bell of 130,000 won.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. There is no dispute between the two parties on the fact that D, as the complainant, sold a total of 1.3 million won to the defendant as above.

In that sense, the Defendant paid KRW 1 million in cash at the time when he received a certificate of permission from the complainant, and agreed to reduce KRW 100,000 between the complainant and the complainant during which only KRW 300,000 has not been paid, and there remains any intention to pay at any time.

The argument is asserted.

On the contrary, the complainant did not receive at all KRW 1.3 million from the police at the time of the instant complaint on March 2017.

30,000 won out of the 1.3 million won in this court after the statement (the 9th page of the evidence record).

was stated.

In this regard, the complainant was investigated by the police due to the fact that the complainant was assaulted by the defendant as a result of the total value problem between the complainant and the defendant.

In December 25, 2016, the statement made to the effect that “the money to be received KRW 40,000 from the defendant in cash and removed KRW 500,000 as a fee for a motor vehicle remains at KRW 7,60,000” (Evidence No. 26 pages) and its statement are inconsistent.

In addition, due to the punishment of the above assault, it is obvious that the defendant's appraisal is not good due to the attitude of the statement, etc., and its credibility is lost.

In addition, I have observed the assault against the defendant of the above complainant.

F.2.2