beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On November 19, 2014, at around 10:30 on November 19, 2014, the Defendant: (a) told the victim D to “I will leave to do so to do so; (b)” (c) cut two gold-half of a half of a picture to be laid on the display site, and cut off two gold-half of a half of the market price of KRW 150,000,000.
Summary of Evidence
1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;
1. Written statements of D;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs and investigative reports (CCTV images and clothing of suspect);
1. The scope of sentence compared with the applicable legal provisions on criminal facts, Article 329 of the Criminal Act regarding the choice of punishment, the grounds for sentencing of sentence [the scope of recommendation] for sentencing of imprisonment [the scope of punishment] for general property, the basic area (f.g., general larceny) for types 2 (f. and the applicable sentencing range: 6-1 year and 6 months (f.g., the decision of sentence]: the Defendant stolen the victim’s eye while the victim is in front of his eye, and interviews with the applicable applicable law; the Defendant committed the instant crime at once, even though he had already been sentenced to the suspension of indictment one time after he was investigated by the investigative agency, and the Defendant escaped as it was still after being investigated by the investigative agency; the Defendant also escaped; the Defendant was highly likely to repeat the crime due to the lack of any family contact with the Defendant; and the victim wants to be punished.
However, the defendant is the first offender, the damaged goods have been immediately returned to the injured party by tracking the defendant, and the defendant's age, character, conduct and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc. shall be determined by taking into account the sentencing conditions specified in the arguments of this case.