logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.06.15 2017고단1584
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 30, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of one million won for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Gwangju District Court on July 30, 201, to a fine of two million won for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving), and a fine of two million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Gwangju District Court on November 8, 201, respectively. On March 14, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence for eight months for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) at the Gwangju District Court on March 14, 201

On March 24, 2017, around 05:00, the Defendant driven BM5 car under the influence of alcohol content 0.139% from the portion of approximately 7km from the front of the mutual influence place in light light string to the front of the 4101st road in Naju-ro.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. Notification of the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. Inquiries about the results of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, investigation report (Attachment, such as a copy of the judgment);

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

(a) favorable condition: The defendant reflects his mistake while recognizing the crime of this case;

B. Unfavorable conditions: The Defendant had already been punished three times due to driving under drinking, and was sentenced to a suspended sentence due to driving under drinking in 2014, but the Defendant again committed the instant crime without being aware of it, and the Defendant led to the occurrence of a traffic accident that causes damage to property due to driving under drinking in this case.

C. The Defendant’s punishment was determined in consideration of the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, circumstances before and after the commission of the crime, and other various sentencing conditions specified in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, which were revealed in the records of the instant case.

arrow